For adapting to the demand of job market, most university students tend to choose some practical courses, such as finance or computer science, because they are told that these courses will make more contribution to their future job hunting than traditional ones. As a result, some people suggest that universities should give priority to practical courses for students. However, for my part, I consider that traditional courses should be given equal priority in education.
Many reasons can account for my views and the following are the most essential aspects. To begin with, taking employment into consideration, traditional courses have provided the most basic knowledge and cultures which have great impact on job hunting and character shaping. Therefore, if universities give priority to practical courses, more and more students will choose these and that will cause the unbalance of employment. Furthermore, out of the need in nation development, traditional course is the most important way for students to inherit our native root cultures. Under the development of globalization, inheriting and keeping our specific culture character is an important strategy in our nation development.
After a thorough consideration, I maintain that universities should give equal priority to both traditional courses and practical courses so that our nation can keep our unique character when keeping pace with the development of globalization.
版权声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容, 请发送邮件至 3372575805@qq.com 举报,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。如若转载,请注明出处:https://yuedu.yahoo001.com/zuowen/211886.html